检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王新征 纪伟 WANG Xinzheng;JI Wei(Department of Radiotherapy,First People’s Hospital of Pingyuan County,Dezhou 253000,China;Department of CT Room,First People's Hospital of Pingyuan County,Dezhou 253000,China)
机构地区:[1]平原县第一人民医院放疗科,山东德州253000 [2]平原县第一人民医院CT室,山东德州253000
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2024年第23期103-106,共4页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨常规CT平扫与多平面重建技术在桡骨远端骨折分型中的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月—2024年1月平原县第一人民医院收治的86例桡骨远端骨折患者的临床资料。所有患者均已行常规CT平扫及多平面重建技术。统计AO分型检出情况,并以关节镜手术检查为金标准,分析不同方法的诊断价值;比较不同方法检出关节内骨块数目、背侧骨块厚度、背缘分离移位距离差异。结果:86例患者经关节镜手术检查检出阳性30例(A型),阴性56例(B型36例+C型20例);其中常规CT平扫检出阳性26例(A型),阴性60例(B型35例+C型25例);多平面重建技术检出阳性29例(A型),阴性57例(B型36例+C型21例)。多平面重建技术诊断桡骨远端骨折分型的灵敏度、准确度高于常规CT平扫,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多平面重建技术检出关节内骨块数目、背侧骨块厚度、背缘分离移位距离为(1.94±0.29)个、(1.82±0.26)mm、(1.67±0.28)mm,优于常规CT平扫的(1.42±0.22)个、(1.47±0.24)mm、(1.12±0.19)mm,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:多平面重建技术诊断桡骨远端骨折分型的价值更高,可于术前精准识别疾病分型,便于制定手术方案。Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of conventional CT plain scan and multiplanar reconstruction in the classification of distal radius fractures.Methods:The clinical data of 86 patients with distal radius fracture admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed.Conventional CT plain scan and multi-plane reconstruction techniques were used to analyze the AO typing and the diagnostic value of different methods was analyzed using arthroscopic surgery as the gold standard.The number of intra-articular bone mass,the thickness of dorsal bone mass,and the separation and displacement distance of dorsal margin were compared between different methods.Results:Out of 86 patients,30 were positive(type A)and 56 were negative(36 were type B and 20 were type C)detected through arthroscopic surgery;Among them,26 cases were detected as positive(type A),and 60 cases were negative(35 cases of type B+25 cases of type C)by routine CT plain scan;Multi plane reconstruction technology detected 29 positive cases(type A)and 57 negative cases(36 cases of type B+21 cases of type C)The sensitivity and accuracy of multi-plane reconstruction in the diagnosis of distal radius fracture were higher than that of conventional CT,with statistical difference(P<0.05).The number of bone fragments in the joint,the thickness of the dorsal bone fragments,and the separation and displacement distance of the dorsal border were(1.94±0.29),(1.82±0.26)mm,(1.67±0.28)mm,respectively,which were better than(1.42±0.22),(1.47±0.24)mm,(1.12±0.19)mm of conventional CT plain scan,and there were statistical differences(P<0.05).Conclusion:The multi-plane reconstruction technique is more valuable in the diagnosis of distal radius fracture classification,which can accurately identify the disease classification before surgery,better formulate the surgical plan.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.0.151