考虑航空业务量的中小型机场航站楼构型研究  

Research on Terminal Configuration of Small and Medium-sized Airports Based on Passenger Throughput

作　　者：卢奕舟 方学东[1] 张一 张建红 LU Yizhou;FANG Xuedong;ZHANG Yi;ZHANG Jianhong(Civil Aviation Flight University of China,Guanghan 618307,Sichuan,China;Beijing Aviation Ground Servicecis Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 101300,China;Xizang Airport Group,Lhasa 851400,Xizang,China)

机构地区：[1]中国民用航空飞行学院,四川广汉618307 [2]北京空港航空地面服务有限公司,北京101300 [3]民航西藏自治区机场集团有限公司,西藏拉萨851400

出　　处：《民航学报》2025年第1期18-23,共6页Journal of Civil Aviation

摘　　要：作为机场规划设计的重要工作,航站楼的构型对于机场的运行效率、旅客服务质量和改扩建具有重要影响。《运输机场总体规划规范》(MH/T 5002)按照年旅客吞吐量将运输机场分为超大型机场等4类,并提出了前列式、指廊式、卫星式3种航站楼候机区构型。针对规范没有明确中小型机场候机区构型指导意见的问题,本研究采用理论计算和SIMMOD PRO软件仿真模拟,对前列式和指廊式两种航站楼构型的平均滑行距离、平均延误时间、靠桥率、旅客平均步行距离、土地集约化利用5个指标进行对比和分析,确定其优缺点和适用性。研究表明,建议远期预测年旅客吞吐量低于1 200万的中小型机场采用前列式航站楼构型,远期预测年旅客吞吐量大于等于1 200万的中型机场采用指廊式航站楼构型。As an important part of airport design, the configuration of the passenger terminal building has significant impact on the operation officiency, the quality of passenger service and the reconstruction and expansion of the airport. “The Specifications for Master Planning of Transportation Airports” classifies airport into 4 categories based on passenger throughput, and defines 3 types of airport terminal configurations: linear, pier and satellite, but it does not specify the guidance for small and medium-sized airports. Using theoretical calculations and SIMMOD PRO software, this paper compares the linear and pier types in terms of average taxiing distance, average delay time, the utilization rate of air bridge, the average walking distance of passengers and the intensive use of land to determine their advantages, disadvantages and applicability. The study recommends that small and medium-sized airports with a long-term predicted annual passenger throughput of less than 12 million should adopt the linear airport terminal configuration, otherwise should adopt the pier airport terminal configuration.

关 键 词：中小型机场 前列式 指廊式 SIMMOD 评价指标 

分 类 号：U8[交通运输工程]