目的理性犯罪论视野下自洗钱犯罪的罪数认定理论阐释  

Theoretical Interpretation of the Determination of the Number of Offenses in Self-Money Laundering Crimes from the Perspective of Purpose-Rational Crime Theory

作　　者：党惠娟 刘铎汉 Dang Hui-juan;Liu Duo-han(Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou Gansu 730070)

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《河西学院学报》2025年第1期85-95,共11页Journal of Hexi University

摘　　要：自洗钱行为入罪后解决了事后不可罚原则限制下洗钱罪条款虚置的状况,但在罪数认定问题上,对于司法机关作数罪并罚处理的普遍立场,学界仍存在较大的质疑。自洗钱入罪是刑法和刑事政策互相协调下为打击洗钱及其上游犯罪的产物,是维护国家金融秩序稳定的需要,因此对其罪数认定问题依然要在刑法与刑事政策的互动关系下进行检视,通过目的理性犯罪论体系对洗钱罪法益的重构,在刑法教义学的语境下由法益到目的,为数罪并罚的司法处断提供具有说服力的理论支撑。The criminalization of self-money laundering has resolved the issue of the virtuality of money laundering provisions under the principle of non-punishability after the fact.However,there is still significant academic doubt regarding the general stance of judicial authorities on concurrent multiple punishment for such crimes.The criminalization of self-money laundering is a product of the coordination between criminal law and criminal policy aimed at combating money laundering and its upstream crimes,and is necessary to maintain the stability of the national financial order.Therefore,the determination of the number of offenses should still be examined within the interactive relationship between criminal law and criminal policy.By reconstructing the legal interest of money laundering through the framework of purpose-rational crime theory and within the context of criminal law dogmatics,the theory provides persuasive support for judicial decisions regarding concurrent punishment,shifting the focus from legal interests to purpose.

关 键 词：自洗钱 数罪并罚 刑事政策 法益保护 预防刑法 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]