检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段贞锋 Duan Zhenfeng(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing,China;School of Political Science and Law,Pingdingshan University,Pingdingshan,China)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120 [2]平顶山学院政法学院,河南平顶山467099
出 处:《社会科学论坛》2025年第1期144-154,共11页Tribune of Social Sciences
摘 要:人工智能技术的高速发展,不仅对社会生活产生了巨大的影响,也对现行著作权制度产生了巨大的冲击。人工智能生成物的权利归属、著作权保护问题引发了学界激烈的争论,对其研究急需且必要。对比《中华人民共和国著作权法》的规定,对当前人工智能生成物是否属于法定的“作品”以及权利归属的争议进行探讨,提出严格可版权性审查、协议确定权利归属、完善事后赔偿等措施,以最大程度实现利益的平衡与权益的保障。The rapid development of artificial intelligence technology has not only had a huge impact on social life,but also had a huge impact on the current copyright system.The ownership and copyright protection of artificial intelligence generated products have sparked heated debates in academia,and research on them is urgently needed and necessary.By comparing the provisions of the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China,this paper explores whether current artificial intelligence generated works belong to legal“works”and the disputes over ownership.Measures such as strict copyright review,agreement determination of ownership,and improvement of post compensation are proposed to achieve maximum balance of interests and protection of rights and interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31