检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王通 WANG Tong(China Railway Shanghai Design Institute Group Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200070,China)
机构地区:[1]中铁上海设计院集团有限公司,上海200070
出 处:《价值工程》2025年第7期17-19,共3页Value Engineering
摘 要:在《公路工程建设项目概算预算编制办法》(JTG 3830-2018)中,隧道洞身土石方开挖、超前小导管、初期支护、二次衬砌、隧道防排水等造价没有按照围岩等级分别计列,只是按照长度笼统计算出隧道的综合造价指标,无法准确反映不同围岩等级对隧道综合造价指标的影响,隧道综合造价指标差异较大,这使得上级审批部门无法准确控制隧道工程造价。为了掌握不同围岩等级的隧道造价情况,本文根据云南省某高速公路隧道设计资料,对隧道工程不同级别围岩的造价进行了详细的分析探讨。In the"Method for Budgeting of Highway Engineering Construction Projects"(JTG 3830-2018),the costs of tunnel excavation,small pipe-roof protection,initial support,secondary lining,tunnel waterproofing and drainage,etc.are not separately calculated according to the surrounding rock classification.The comprehensive cost index of the tunnel is only calculated based on the length,which cannot accurately reflect the impact of different rock classification on the comprehensive cost index of the tunnel.The comprehensive cost index of the tunnel varies greatly,which makes it difficult for the approval department to accurately control the cost of the tunnel project.In order to understand the cost of tunnels with different classes of surrounding rock,this article conducted a detailed analysis and discussion on the cost of tunnels with different classes of surrounding rock based on the design data of a tunnel on a expressway in Yunnan province.
分 类 号:U455.1[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15