检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚行仁 王圣云[2] YAO Xing-ren;WANG Sheng-yun(School of Economics,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073;School of Economics and Management,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学经济学院,武汉430073 [2]南昌大学经济管理学院,南昌330031
出 处:《软科学》2025年第2期49-58,共10页Soft Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(42061026);2024年度全国统计科学研究重点项目(2024LZ023)。
摘 要:重构了包容性财富指数指标体系,测算了1978—2020年中国包容性财富指数,应用“三轴图”Dagum基尼系数和地理探测器揭示了包容性财富指数资本结构空间差异演变特征及其驱动因素。研究发现:(1)考察期内中国包容性财富指数快速提升,各省份包容性财富指数存在明显的“马太效应”,资本结构逐步从低级阶段向高级阶段跨越。(2)考察期内我国包容性财富指数及各类资本的总体区域差异趋于扩大,且主要来源于区域间差异,尤其是东部与其他地区间的差异。(3)经济规模、财政支出、就业、消费、城镇化水平、进出口水平等因素对中国包容性财富的区域差异具有显著驱动效应,且存在双因子增强的交互作用,有明显的资本异质性和区域异质性。This paper reconstructs the indicator system of China′s Inclusive Wealth Index(IWI),measures China′s IWI from 1978 to 2020,and applies"three-axis map"and Dagum Gini and Geodetector to reveal the characteristics of China′s capital structure and spatial differences in IWI and its driving factors.The results show that(1)China′s IWI increased rapidly from 1978 to 2020,there was an obvious Matthew effect in the IWI of each province,and the capital structure gradually crossed from the lower stage to the higher stage.(2)The overall regional differences in China′s IWI and various types of capital tended to widen from 1978 to 2020,with the overall regional differences mainly stemming from inter-regional differences,especially between the East and other regions.(3)Economic,fiscal expenditure,employment,consumption,urbanization,and EXW have significant driving effects on the regional heterogeneity of China′s inclusive wealth,and there were two-factor enhanced interactions with significant capital heterogeneity and regional heterogeneity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.164.249