肾肿瘤评分系统的研究进展  

Research progress on renal tumor scoring system

作　　者：张浩洋 凌志新 许爽 陈浩[2] 欧阳骏[2] Zhang Haoyang;Ling Zhixin;Xu Shuang;Chen Hao;Ouyang Jun(Department of Urology,the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,215123 Suzhou,China;Department of Urology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,215006 Suzhou,China)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学附属第四医院泌尿外科,江苏215123 [2]苏州大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,江苏215006

出　　处：《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》2025年第1期88-94,共7页Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助课题(82002715);江苏省自然科学基金资助课题(BK20190170)。

摘　　要：肾肿瘤评分系统是评估肾肿瘤复杂程度的重要工具。自R.E.N.A.L.评分问世以来,许多基于不同解剖参数的评分系统相继提出,目的是找到评估肾部分切除术可行性及其并发症风险的关键参数。本文在第一代肾肿瘤评分系统的基础上,进一步阐述了mR.E.N.A.L评分、SPARE评分、m-CI、ABCD评分、瘤周动脉评分系统、频谱评分、以肿瘤为中心的多平面重建、DDD评分、RNP评分、肾柱侵犯数目、零缺血指数、C.L.A.M.P.评分、三维肾脏评分系统和ROADS评分共14种肾肿瘤评分系统,旨在为临床医师选择合适的评分系统提供参考,并探索更简单、有效和实用的肾肿瘤评分系统。The renal tumor scoring system is an important tool for assessing the complexity of renal tumors. Since the emergence of the R.E.N.A.L. scoring system, many scoring systems based on different anatomical parameters have been proposed to identify key parameters for evaluating the feasibility and risk of complications of partial nephrectomy. On the basis of the first-generation renal tumor scoring system, this article further elaborates on the mR E. N.A.L score, SPARE score, m-CI, ABCD score, peritumoral arterial scoring system, spectral score, tumor centered multi plane reconstruction,DDD score, RNP score, number of renal column invasions, zero ischemia index, C L. A.M.P. score, three-dimensional renal scoring system, and ROADS score, aimed at providing reference for clinicians to choose appropriate scoring systems and exploring simpler, more effective, and practical renal tumor scoring systems.

关 键 词：肾部分切除术 肾肿瘤 评分系统 

分 类 号：R73[医药卫生—肿瘤]