安顿命运抑或虚耗人生:数字化时代民间大众的“文科”想象--基于B站志愿填报话题讨论的幻想主题分析  

Settling Fate or Squandering Life:The"Humanities"Imagination of the General Public in the Digital Age

作　　者：孙孝孝 SUN Xiao-xiao

机构地区：[1]厦门大学教育研究院教师发展中心

出　　处：《新闻知识》2024年第10期27-36,93,共11页News Research

摘　　要：“文科危机”由来已久,在数字化时代更易掀起网络热议。从幻想主题分析的修辞分析法可知,民众观看视频《学文科是死路一条吗》留下的评论及弹幕,反映了该网络趣群围绕“大学文科教育之功用”展开的修辞互动,在经验符号覆诵的修辞实践中建构起了“文科教育安顿命运”与“文科教育虚耗人生”的学科想象,经由“文科教育使人‘安所遂生’”与“文科教育使人无前途”两个幻想类型编织修辞网络。后者的民间认同度更高,由此聚合出的修辞视野是物性与灵性相分野的教育目标。而建构多元的教育叙事话语,创造本真生活,应为教育的新方向,这为人文社会科学何以在“新文科”建设中亲近“文科教育安顿命运”这一本真教育目标提供了自下而上的经验性启迪。The notion of a"Liberal arts crisis"has persisted over time,garnering increased attention and discussion in the digital era.Based on a rhetorical analysis of"Is Pursuing Humanities a Dead End?"on the Bilibili platform,this paper points out that through the rhetorical practice of experiential symbols,it constructs the disciplinary imaginations of"humanities education as a means of settling fate"and"humanities education as a wasteful pursuit of life".It concludes that humanities and social sciences should embrace the genuine educational desire of"liberal education as a means of settling fate"in the development of the"new humanities."

关 键 词：新文科 教育改变命运 高考志愿 幻想主题 修辞分析 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]