机构地区:[1]莆田市第一医院介入血管外科,福建莆田351100
出 处:《介入放射学杂志》2025年第1期74-78,共5页Journal of Interventional Radiology
摘 要:目的探讨中高危急性肺栓塞(APE)患者肺动脉CT血管造影(CTPA)横断面测量的肺动脉直径(PAD)、PAD/主动脉直径(AOD)、右心室直径(RVD)、RVD/左心室直径(LVD)与栓塞程度、心脏生物标志物的相关性。方法纳入2021年1月至2023年12月于莆田市第一医院接受介入治疗的中高危APE患者53例。在CTPA横断面测量PAD、PAD/AOD、RVD、RVD/LVD,分析上述指标与CT栓塞指数(CTEI)、氨基末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)的相关性。结果PAD、RVD、RVD/LVD与CTEI存在弱-中等度正相关(r分别为0.506、0.310、0.452,P值分别为<0.001、0.024、0.001),PAD/AOD与CTEI不存在相关性(r=0.247,P=0.075)。与NT-proBNP阴性组比较,阳性组PAD、PAD/AOD、RVD/LVD较高(均P<0.05),2组间RVD差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。NT-proBNP与PAD、PAD/AOD、RVD、RVD/LVD存在弱-中等度正相关(r分别为0.454、0.326、0.302、0.405,P值分别为0.001、0.017、0.028、0.003)。cTnI阴性组和阳性组间PAD、PAD/AOD、RVD、RVD/LVD差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。cTnI与PAD、PAD/AOD、RVD、RVD/LVD均不存在相关性(r分别为0.188、0.042、-0.021、0.139,P值分别为0.195、0.772、0.884、0.342)。结论CTPA横断面量化指标有助于评估APE栓塞程度和右心功能,但不能用于评估心肌损伤。Objective To explore the correlation between the pulmonary artery diameter(PAD),PAD/aortic diameter(AOD),right ventricular diameter(RVD),RVD/left ventricular diameter(LVD) measured on pulmonary artery CT angiography(CTPA) cross-sectional images and the degree of embolism, cardiac biomarkers in patients with medium-to-high risk acute pulmonary embolism(APE).Methods The clinical data of 53 patients with medium-to-high risk APE,who received interventional treatment at the Putian Municipal First Hospital of China From January 2021 to December 2023,were retrospectively analyzed.The PAD,PAD/AOD,RVD,and RVD/LVD were measured on CTPA cross-sectional images.The correlations of the above indexes with CT embolism index(CTEI),N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),and cardiac troponin I(cTnI) were analyzed.Results A weak-moderate positive correlation existed between PAD,RVD,RVD/LVD and CTEI(r=0.506,r=0.310,r=0.452 respectively, P<0.001,P=0.024,P=0.001 respectively),while no correlation existed between PAD/AOD and CTEI(r=0.247,P=0.075).Compared with the NT-proBNP negative group, in the NT-proBNP positive group the values of PAD,PAD/AOD and RVD/LVD were higher(all P<0.05),and there was no statistically significant difference in RVD value between the two groups(P>0.05).A weak-moderate positive correlation existed between NT-proBNP and PAD,PAD/AOD,RVD,RVD/LVD(r=0.454,r=0.326,r=0.302,r=0.405 respectively, P=0.001,P=0.017,P=0.028,P=0.003 respectively).There were no statistically significant differences in PAD,PAD/AOD,RVD and RVD/LVD values between the cTnI negative group and the cTnI positive group(all P>0.05).No correlation existed between cTnI and PAD,PAD/AOD,RVD,RVD/LVD(r=0.188,r=0.042,r=-0.021,r=0.139 respectively, and P=0.195,P=0.772,P=0.884,P=0.342 respectively).Conclusion CTPA cross-sectional quantitative indicators are helpful in evaluating the embolism degree of APE and right heart function, but it cannot be used to assess myocardial injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...