人民陪审员实质参与在线庭审的实践检视与路径完善  

Practical review and path improvement of people's assessors'substantive participation in online trial

作　　者：孟思 Meng Si

机构地区：[1]国家法官学院,北京100071

出　　处：《南海法学》2025年第1期52-62,共11页The South China Sea Law Journal

摘　　要：在线庭审打破了传统庭审的时空场域,以其便捷高效的特点,适应了当今快节奏、网络化的司法需求。“面对面”变成“屏对屏”,人民陪审员参审面临新的挑战。“陪审”变“观审”,参审形式化;“有序”变“无序”,参审随意化;“线下”变“线上”,参审复杂化。上述问题既拖延在线庭审进程,又损害司法权威和公信力,亦影响人民陪审员制度的功能发挥。在线实质参审困局的出现是缺乏庭审认知、规则指引、配套监督等因素综合作用的结果。本文在借鉴麦肯锡7S模型理论的基础上,从增进价值认同、加强规则设计、健全配套制度三方面入手,提出人民陪审员实质参与在线庭审的创新规则和优化路径,以期让正义之槌在云端更好延伸,让民主之光在云端更好彰显。Online trial breaks the traditional time and space boundaries of trial,and with its convenient and efficient characteristics,it meets the current fast-paced networked judicial needs."face to face"turns into"screen to screen",which brings new challenges to the participation of people's assessors in trial;"accompanying trial"turns into"watching trial",leading to formalization of participation;"orderly"turns into"disorderly",leading randomness in participation;"offline"turns into"online",leading to complexity in participation.These problems not only delay the progress of online trial but also damage the authority and credibility of the judiciary,and also affect the function of the people's assessor system.The emergence of the dilemma of substantial participation in online trial is a combination of factors such as lack of trial awareness,rule guidance,and supporting supervision.Based on the McKinsey 7S model theory,this paper innovative rules and optimization paths for the substantial participation of people's assessors in online trial from three aspects:enhancing value recognition,strengthening rule design,and improving supporting.This is to ensure that the hammer of justice can better extend in the cloud,and the light of democracy can better shine in the cloud.

关 键 词：人民陪审员 在线庭审 实质参审 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]