检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨德群[1] 袁涵 YANG De-qun;YUAN Han(Law School,Hengyang Normal University,Hengyang 421008,Hunan,China;Management Committee of Changde Economic and Technological Development Zone,Changde 415001,Hunan,China)
机构地区:[1]衡阳师范学院法学院,湖南衡阳421008 [2]湖南省常德市经济技术开发区管理委员会,湖南常德415001
出 处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2025年第1期54-59,共6页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
基 金:2023年度国家社会科学基金项目“法学方法论视角下公序良俗原则司法适用研究”(项目编号:23BFX041)阶段性成果。
摘 要:绿色原则是《中华人民共和国民法典》回应21世纪环境问题的“中国方案”,是划分私人利益与环保公益的界限。尽管关于绿色原则能否适用存在理论争议,但从既有997份裁判文书分析可知,该原则确立之后,即在司法实践中得以广泛运用。通过全面分析绿色原则司法适用的功能、类型化以及具体判断等问题,文章认为应如其他民法基本原则一样,先以提供价值选择的方式进入司法裁判,通过司法裁判践行绿色民法理论,由此该原则的司法适用才能得到更为广泛的认可。The green principle is the“Chinese solution”of the Civil Code in response to environmental issues in the 21st century,and it marks the boundary between private interests and public environmental protection interests.Although there are theoretical disputes over whether the green principle can be applied,an analysis of the existing 997 judicial documents shows that since its establishment,this principle has been widely used in judicial practice.Through a comprehensive analysis of issues such as the functions,classification and specific judgments regarding the judicial application of the green principle,this article holds that,just like other basic principles of civil law,it should first enter judicial judgments by providing options for value choices,and practice the theory of green civil law through judicial judgments,so that the judicial application of this principle can be more widely recognized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.103.13