不当得利返还请求权和物权返还请求权适用关系探究  

Research on the Applicable Relationship between the Right to Claim the Return of Unjust Enrichment and the Right to Claim the Return of Real Rights

作　　者：高原 GAO Yuan(Taiyuan Branch of DeHeng Law Firm,Taiyuan 030000,Shanxi,China)

机构地区：[1]北京德恒律师事务所太原分所,山西太原030000

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2025年第1期93-96,共4页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘　　要：由于我国《民法典》未明确认可物权的独立性与无因性,致使对不当得利返还请求权和物权返还请求权之间的适用关系难以厘清。通过借鉴德国民法学学理和《德国民法典》中的相关法律规定,将占有作为一项民事权利予以承认,明了“占有”的法律属性,进而明确返还原物请求权和占有保护请求权之间的适用关系,通过对比分析物权返还请求权与不当得利返还请求权之间请求权基础内涵的差异,承认其竞合关系,厘清二者间的适用关系。Since China’s “Civil Code” does not clearly recognize the independence and abstractness of real rights,it is difficult to clarify the applicable relationship between the right to claim the return of unjust enrichment and the right to claim the return of real rights.By drawing on and analogizing the academic theories of German civil law and the relevant legal provisions in the“German Civil Code”,possession should be recognized as a civil right,the legal nature of“possession”be understood,and then the applicable relationship between the right to claim the return of the original thing and the right to claim the protection of possession also be clarified.By comparing and analyzing the differences in the basic connotations of the right to claim the return of real rights and the right to claim the return of unjust enrichment,their concurrence relationship should be recognized so as to clarify the applicable relationship between the two.

关 键 词：不当得利 物权返还请求权 占有返还请求权 侵权责任 德国民法典 

分 类 号：DF521[政治法律—民商法学]