检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪菡珑 HONG Hanlong
机构地区:[1]福州大学法学院,福州350108
出 处:《亚太经济》2025年第1期44-59,共16页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基 金:2024年福建省社会科学基金博士扶持项目“跨境税收争议解决机制的整体化研究”(FJ2024BF018)。
摘 要:基于BEPS项目的全球税收治理框架遭受质疑的根本原因在于国家之间的结构性不平等,使发展中国家无法有效发声并争取利益。全球税收治理亟待解决的根本问题是保障国际税收谈判及决策的代表性与平衡性,这对于全球经济的均衡发展至关重要。一方面,参与全球税收治理的国家既要认清不同国家在资源、能力和相对议价实力上的差异,也要帮助发展中国家提升税收治理能力建设;另一方面,完善BEPS包容性框架的民主性与透明度有助于促进全球税收治理向更加公正合理的方向发展。同时,中国作为世界第二大经济体,应担负起大国责任,发挥应有的作用。The fundamental reason why the global tax governance framework based on the BEPS project has been questioned is the structural inequality among countries,which prevents de-veloping countries'from effectively speaking out and fighting for their own interests.The funda-mental issue of global tax governance that needs to be resolved is to ensure the representativeness and balance of international tax negotiations and decision-making,which is crucial for the balanced development of the global economy.On the one hand,countries participating in global tax gover-nance should recognize the differences in resources,capabilities and relative bargaining power of different countries,and should help developing countries to improve their tax governance capacity.On the other hand,improving the democracy and transparency of the inclusive framework of BEPS will help promote the development of global tax governance in the direction of greater jus-tice and rationality.At the same time,China,as the world's second largest economy,should shoul-der its responsibility as a major country and play its due role.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.253.49