检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Fakher ABBAS Jianjun DU Haibin CHEN Muhammad AZEEM Ruqin FAN
机构地区:[1]Guangdong Engineering and Technology Center for Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control in Agricultural Producing Areas,College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering,Guangzhou 510225,China [2]Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences,PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi,Rawalpindi 46000,Pakistan
出 处:《Pedosphere》2025年第1期67-83,共17页土壤圈(英文版)
基 金:support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.42177299);the Guangdong Province Key Areas Research and Development Plan Project,China—Key Preparation Technology and Application of Green and Efficient Agricultural Input Controlled-Release Materials(No.2023B0202080002)。
摘 要:Soil aggregate stability is a fundamental measure for evaluating soil structure.While numerous tests exist for assessing soil aggregate stability,ultrasonic agitation(UA)is widely recognized for its effectiveness.Nonetheless,a significant limitation of UA is the lack of standardized methodologies and stability assessment criteria,resulting in inconsistency and incomparability across studies.Several critical factors influence the assessment of soil aggregate stability,including sample preparation(e.g.,drying,sieving,and settling duration),initial and final aggregate size classes,the definition of final energy form and its calculation,variations in instrumentation and laboratory procedures,and the absence of standardized criteria.Unlike some stability methods,UA produces a broad range of results,with dispersion energy varying significantly(0.5–13440 J g^(-1))across different soil and aggregate types due to divergent procedural settings.These settings encompass factors such as initial power and amplitude,temperature fluctuation,soil/water ratio,probe specification(diameter and insertion depth),and the choice of liquid used during the process.Furthermore,UA faces challenges related to limited reproducibility,raising doubts about its status as a standard stability assessment method.To address these issues,standardization through predefined procedures and stability criteria has the potential to transform UA into a precise and widely accepted method for both qualitative and quantitative assessments of soil stability.In this comprehensive review,we outline the challenges in standardizing UA,elucidate the factors contributing to dispersion energy variation,and offer practical recommendations to establish standardized protocols for UA in soil aggregate stability assessments.
关 键 词:aggregate cavitation dispersion energy particle size distribution soil structure stability method ultrasonication
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7