反垄断损害赔偿责任认定的反思与完善--基于对93份民事判决书的实证分析  

Reflections and Improvement on the Determination of Anti-monopoly Liability for Damages:Based on an Empirical Analysis of 93 Civil Judgments

作　　者：杨一 YANG Yi(The CUPL Center of Competition Law,Beijing 100091,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学竞争法研究中心,北京100091

出　　处：《河北法学》2025年第1期163-186,共24页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“新发展阶段资本规范健康发展的经济法保障研究”(22CFX037)。

摘　　要：反垄断损害赔偿责任的认定问题关乎反垄断民事救济的有效性,但我国反垄断立法和实践尚未建立起损害赔偿责任认定的体系化规范框架。鉴于反垄断立法规范的缺失,有必要引入侵权法领域所提供的规范技术以充实反垄断损害赔偿责任认定的工具库,同时适用适当的法技术工具使其更为契合反垄断法的政策取向。具体而言,适用“规范损害说”以损害事实的认定作为反垄断损害赔偿责任认定的起点要素;引入相当因果关系以判断损害是否是垄断行为的通常后果,同时辅以规范目的说以确定反垄断法旨在防止的损害;考虑到垄断案件的复杂性以及原被告双方力量失衡的现实情况,反垄断损害赔偿责任的认定应当采用过错推定的方式,当事人可自行主张不存在过错以免责。在此基础上,同步优化赔偿数额的计算方法,以推动反垄断损害赔偿责任的落实。Anti-monopoly liability for damages is related to the effectiveness of anti-monopoly civil remedies,but China's anti-monopoly legislation and practice have not yet established a systematic regulatory framework for determining liability for damages.In view of the lack of anti-monopoly legislation,the rules provided in the field of tort law can be introduced.Specifically,the"normative damage theory"is applied to take the determination of the fact of damage as the starting point for determining the liability for anti-monopoly damages.Adequate causationis introduced to determine whether the damage is an ordinary consequencee of a monopolistic behavior,supplemented by normative goal theory to determine the damage that the antitrust law aims to prevent.Considering the complexity of the monopoly case and the reality of the imbalance of power between plaintiffs and defendants,the determination of antimonopoly damage liability should adopt the method of presumption of fault,and the parties may claim that there is no fault to avoid liability.On this basis,the calculation method of compensation amount is simultaneously optimized to promote the implementation of anti-monopoly damage liability.

关 键 词：反垄断 损害赔偿 因果关系 救济范围 赔偿数额 

分 类 号：DF414[政治法律—经济法学]