论文化主体性建设——基于梁启超中国思想史“主系、旁系、闰系”的分析  

On the Construction of Cultural Subjectivity:An Analysis Based on Liang Qichao's History of Thought in China with"the Main Line,the Side Line,and the Sub⁃line"

作　　者：察应坤 CHA Yingkun

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《济南大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期56-67,189,190,共14页Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition

基　　金：2024年习近平文化思想研究中心重大课题“‘两个结合’的重大意义和丰富内涵研究”(项目编号:24&WZD02);山东大学中华民族现代文明建设研究专项“中华民族现代文明与文化主体性建设”(项目编号:24RWZX11)。

摘　　要：19世纪末20世纪初,西方思想、主义、制度势不可挡地涌入中国,这一冲击使得儒家经世致用理想遭受严重侵蚀。在此背景下,梁启超不仅仅是以颠覆“旧史学”,“写自下而上的历史”之先河为己任,更为重要的是此后他引介、批判西方历史理论,又打破了中国史家全盘移植“西洋史”理论与方法、“根据西方历史模式来再建构和再诠释中国历史”的史学研究藩篱,形构了“一个近代中国批判西方主流文化的传统”,以“思想史的三个组成部分:主系、旁系、闰系”方法论为依据,呼吁构建中国学术思想的第三主系,这对建设现代中国中华民族的文化主体性具有奠基性意义。At the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries,Western ideas,doctrines,and systems flooded into China,severely undermining the Confucian ideal for the practical application of learning.Against this backdrop,Liang Qichao not only took it upon himself to subvert the"old historiography"and advocate for"writing history from the bottom-up".More importantly,he introduced and critiqued Western historical theories.He broke through the barrier in Chinese historical research where Chinese historians simply transplanted the theories and methods of"Western history"and"reconstructed and reinterpreted Chinese history according to the Western historical model",thus giving rise to"a tradition of modern Chinese criticism of Western mainstream culture".Drawing on the methodology of"the three components of the history of thought:the main line,the side line,and the sub-line",he called for the construction of the third main line of Chinese academic thought.This is of fundamental significance for the construction of cultural subjectivity of the Chinese nation in modern China.

关 键 词：梁启超 史学研究 文化主体性 列文森 综合主义 

分 类 号：K203[历史地理—历史学]