检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭浩琦 杜静[1] 朱蕾[1] TAN Haoqi;DU Jing;ZHU Lei(Department of Construction and Real Estate,School of Civil Engineering,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189)
机构地区:[1]东南大学土木工程学院建设与房地产系,江苏南京211189
出 处:《工程管理学报》2025年第1期141-147,共7页Journal of Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金“双碳”专项项目(52341802).
摘 要:为探究我国房地产企业在当前制度背景下进行ESG信息披露的行为特征及实践决策原理,引入合法性理论,在构建房地产企业ESG信息披露指标框架的基础上,运用内容分析法从完整性和真实性两方面对我国A股上市房地产企业的ESG信息披露策略进行量化。结果表明,房地产企业ESG信息披露策略可以划分为默许、选择、抵抗、回避四类,并且有38%的企业采取了相对消极的抵抗或回避策略,将不利于房地产企业ESG生态体系的健康发展。为此,基于“制度环境-评价者合法性判断-企业行为”的ESG合法性框架,应从政府、外部评价者、房地产企业多方加以引导,以促进房地产企业向更加积极的ESG披露策略转化。In order to explore how China's real estate enterprises make ESG disclosure and practice decision-making under the current institutional context,the legitimacy theory is introduced,and on the basis of constructing a framework of ESG disclosure indicators for the real estate industry,the content analysis method is used to quantify the ESG disclosure strategies of China's A-share listed real estate enterprises in terms of completeness and authenticity.The results show that the ESG disclosure strategies of real estate enterprises can be divided into four categories:acquiescence,choice,resistance,and avoidance.Notably,38%of the enterprises adopt relatively negative resistance or avoidance strategies,which may hinder the healthy development of the real estate industry's ESG ecosystem.Therefore,on the basis of the ESG legitimacy framework of"institutional environment-evaluator's legitimacy judgment-corporate behavior",the government,external evaluators,and enterprises should be guided to promote the transformation of real estate enterprises to more positive ESG disclosure strategies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.167.59