粗野的地域:新粗野主义的地区分异及其当代价值  

Brutish regionalism:Regional differentiation of New Brutalism and its contemporary value

作　　者：卢健松[1] 曾毅超 徐伊玲 LU Jiansong;ZENG Yichao;XU Yiling

机构地区：[1]湖南大学建筑与规划学院

出　　处：《西部人居环境学刊》2025年第1期12-18,共7页Journal of Human Settlements in West China

基　　金：陈张敏聪夫人慈善基金项目(IR 91/9906)。

摘　　要：一种建筑的思想,或相应的设计手法,不会简单的隐没,其间有价值的部分会以不同的方式留存下来。为了提炼“新粗野主义”的价值,首先,本文对1950—1960年间“新粗野主义”的概念和思想重新梳理整合,以得到具体的概念特征;其次,本文对1960以后,“新粗野主义”经济适宜、形态易辨、材料诚实、设施外露等特征在不同地区的发展与持续影响进行研究,挖掘其对建筑电讯派、高技派、批判地域主义、建构研究、新陈代谢派、街道空间研究等领域的影响;再次,本文对“新粗野主义”建筑理论1960年以后在英国、美国、日本、巴西等不同地域的传播、流变、影响进行研究,对其在现代建筑理论中承上启下的作用进行回顾与梳理。在此基础上,进一步阐释了“新粗野主义”对中国当代人居建设在地区差异、城乡差异上的借鉴价值。This paper begins from a global perspective,grounded in the dual aspects of architectural theory and practice.Through historical tracing,regional comparison,and contemporary reflection,it systematically explains the core theory,regional differentiation,and modern implications of“New Brutalism”,aiming to provide cross-cultural critical references for contemporary human settlement construction in China.The article first reconstructs the core concepts and ideological lineage of“New Brutalism”in the 1950s and 1960s.The emergence of“New Brutalism”was influenced by multiple factors,including Cubism,Purism,Dadaism,and Art Brut.In the first half of the 20th century,early modern architects,including Le Corbusier,contributed to the exploration of formal architectural principles for this type of architecture.In the 1950s and 1960s,post-war generations of architects and architectural theorists promoted and socialized the value of the theory.After the 1960s,“New Brutalism”gradually faded,and its architectural features,material characteristics,and theoretical principles gradually merged with emerging architectural movements and theories,forming broader and more profound impacts.The paper then divides the discussion into four aspects:economic appropriateness,distinguishable forms,material authenticity,and exposed facilities,explaining how each of these characteristics of“New Brutalism”has influenced subsequent architectural practice and theoretical development.1)“Economic appropriateness”emerged as a reflection of the economic difficulties during post-WWII European reconstruction.It provides the ethical support and principle discovery for the appearance of“New Brutalism”.Thus,typical and pure“New Brutalism”practices often emerged in the early stages of economic take-off in certain regions.Once economic constraints were lifted,the theory remained only in its formal elements and merged with other emerging ideologies in these regions.2)“Distinguishable forms”include three sub-characteristics:com

关 键 词：新粗野主义 地区 分异 当代价值 

分 类 号：TU207[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]