论历史唯物主义的误读与正解——基于马克思对历史目的论的批判  

On the misreading and correct interpretation of historical materialism Based on Marx’s criticism of historical teleology

作　　者：吴晓琴 WU Xiaoqin(School of Marxism,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China)

机构地区：[1]西南大学马克思主义学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《河南理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期18-25,共8页Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：历史唯物主义自创立以来就遭到众多的误读和曲解。其中有一种观点将历史唯物主义理解为某种唯心主义的历史目的论,进而走上了偏离“现实的人及其历史发展的科学”的歧路。这种误读究其根源在于没有切中马克思在历史唯物主义创立过程中对历史目的论这种错误历史观的批判。马克思在自身历史观变革的进程中批判了以黑格尔以及青年黑格尔派为代表的德国思辨历史目的论,揭示了社会历史的真正本质及其发展规律。这一批判构成马克思创建历史唯物主义的一个内在环节。因此,把握马克思对历史目的论的批判有助于回归历史唯物主义的研究正道,进而为准确把握“现实的人及其历史发展的科学”提供了重要启示。Historical materialism has been subjected to many misinterpretations since its establishment.Some people understand historical materialism as a kind of historical teleology,and then go astray from“the real science of real man and his historical development.”The root of the problem lies in the failure to address Marx’s criticism of the wrong conception of history teleology in the course of the establishment of historical materialism.Marx criticized the German speculative historical teleology represented by Hegelian philosophy and the Young Hegelians,and revealed the nature of social history and its develop-ment law.This criticism constitutes an intrinsic part of Marx’s creation of historical materialism.There-fore,grasping Marx’s criticism of historical teleology is helpful to return to the correct path of historical materialism,and then provides important enlightenment for accurately grasping“the science of real man and his historical development”.

关 键 词：马克思 历史目的论 历史唯物主义的科学性 批判 

分 类 号：B03[哲学宗教—哲学理论]