刑民行交叉案中空白罪状的补充与适用  

Supplement to and Application of Blank Offence Description in Cases with the Intersection of Criminal-Civil or Criminal-Administrative Norms

作　　者：庄劲[1] ZHUANG Jing

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《政治与法律》2025年第2期68-84,共17页Political Science and Law

摘　　要：填补空白罪状时,刑法应否从属于作为补充规范的民事、行政规范,取决于补充规范在空白罪状中居于何种地位。要回答这个问题,不能依赖于授权立法理论和法秩序统一原理,应立足于空白罪状的法律解释结构。补充规范并非刑法的法律渊源,而是刑法的解释渊源。补充空白罪状,就是参考而非遵照补充规范解释空白要素的过程。在空白罪状中,刑法和补充规范存在位阶关系,作为解释渊源的补充规范须服从于被解释的刑法。若二者存在价值目标、调整行为、归责规则、预设语境的差异,应在解释中修正补充规范的相关规定。At the time of making up for the blank offense description,whether the criminal law should be subordinated to civil or administrative norms as supplementary norms depends on the status of the supplementary norms in the blank offence description.To answer this question,we cannot rely on the theory of authorized legislation and the principle of the unity of the legal order,but rather on the structure of the legal interpretation of the blank offence description.Supplementary norms are not a legal source of criminal law,but an interpretative source.Making up for the blank offense description is the process of interpreting the blank elements by reference to-not in compliance with-the supplementary norms.In the blank offence description,there is a hierarchical relationship between the criminal law and the supplementary norms,and the supplementary norms as an interpretative source are subordinated to the criminal law to be interpreted.If there are differences in value goals,adjusting behaviors,rules on liability attribution and presuppositional contexts between them,the relevant stipulation of the supplementary norms should be amended during the interpretation.

关 键 词：刑民行交叉 空白罪状 补充规范 解释渊源 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]