政产学研协同创新对产业创新绩效的影响机制——以医药制造业为例  

Influence Mechanism of Collaborative Innovation Among the Government,Industry,University and Research Institute in Industrial Innovation Performance:A Case Study of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Sector

作　　者：王晓旭 赵立雨 王成军[1] Wang Xiaoxu;Zhao Liyu;Wang Chengjun(School of Business Administration,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233030,China;School of Public Policy&Management,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学工商管理学院,安徽蚌埠233030 [2]中国矿业大学公共管理学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2025年第1期18-27,共10页Science and Technology Management Research

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划重点项目“基于三重螺旋的合肥创新型城市崛起管理研究”(AHSKZ2021D04);江苏省社会科学基金项目“江苏加快推进科技创新实践进路研究”(24ZHB003);江苏省社会科学基金二十大专项重点项目“增强江苏基础研究能力的战略路径研究”(24ZXZA027)。

摘　　要：协同创新是提高产业创新绩效的有效途径。以医药制造业为研究对象,从政府、产业、高校和研究机构3个层面出发,采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法分析三重螺旋协同创新系统驱动医药制造业提升创新绩效的关键因素与条件组合,为具备不同资源条件的地区提供产生高产业创新绩效的路径参考。研究结果表明:(1)高校专业基础构成了高产业创新绩效的必要条件,同时在产生高创新绩效的等效路径中均包含了产业技术创新这一核心条件;(2)存在4条实现高产业创新绩效的路径,可归纳概括为产学协同共驱型、产业主导弥补型和官产学合作发展型3种驱动模式。其中产学协同共驱型驱动路径表明在产学基础较完备的情况下,辅之以积极的政府政策发布能够形成高创新绩效,即使一定程度上缺乏政府经济支持,同样也能推动医药制造业高创新绩效的形成;产业主导弥补型驱动路径表明强劲的产业技术创新和稳固的高校专业基础能够弥补政府在经济支持与政策支撑方面表现的欠缺,从而推动医药制造业高创新绩效的形成;官产学合作发展型驱动路径表明只要产业技术创新能力强,而且政府经济支持有力、研究机构投入强劲、高校专业基础稳固,产业研发投入的欠缺并不影响医药制造业高创新绩效的形成。由此从强化产教基础、构建产学研创新平台、激发产业内驱升级、促进三重螺旋创新协作4个方面提出政策建议。Collaborative innovation is an effective way to improve the performance of industrial innovation.This paper takes the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector as the research object.Using the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)method,starting from the three levels of government,industry,universities and research institutions,it analyzes the key factors and condition combinations of the triple helix collaborative innovation system driving pharmaceutical manufacturing industrial innovation performance,providing a path reference for regions with different resource conditions to generate high industrial innovation performance.The research results indicate as follows:(1)Having a professional foundation in universities is a necessary condition for high industrial innovation performance,and the core condition of industrial technological innovation is included in the equivalent path of generating high innovation performance.(2)There are four paths to achieve high industrial innovation performance,which can be summarized as three driving models:the industry-university collaborative driving model,the industry-dominated complementary model,and the government-industry-university cooperative development model.Among them,the driving path of the industry-university collaborative driving model indicates that,in the case of a relatively complete industry academia foundation,active government policy release can form high innovation performance,even if there is a certain lack of government economic support,it can also promote the formation of high innovation performance;the driving path of the industry-dominated complementary model indicates that strong industrial technological innovation and a solid foundation of university majors can compensate for the government's lack of economic and policy support,thereby promoting the formation of high innovation performance;the driving path of the government-industryuniversity cooperative development model indicates that,as long as it has strong industrial and technological innovati

关 键 词：协同创新 产业创新绩效 模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA) 

分 类 号：G321[文化科学] G324.21G301