地理标志反不正当竞争法保护的正当性及进路  

The Legitimacy and Approachs of Geographical Indication in Anti-unfair Competition Law Protection

作　　者：孙智[1] 毛陈武 SUN Zhi;MAO Chenwu(Law School,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang Guizhou 550025)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《兴义民族师范学院学报》2025年第1期50-56,共7页Journal of Minzu Normal University of Xingyi

基　　金：2024年国家知识产权局软科学研究项目“构建统一地理标志保护制度之专门法设计研究”(项目编号:SS24-A-05);2023年贵州省知识产权战略研究项目“地理标志保护运用的贵州实践及其立法保障研究”(项目编号:黔知战略[2023]07)。

摘　　要：我国地理标志资源丰富,潜在商业和文化价值十分突出,加强地理标志保护意义重大。从法理上讲,加强地理标志保护并不只是专门法和商标法的“专有领地”,反不正当竞争法对地理标志保护同样具有正当性和必要性;从相关国际规则和域外实践来看还具有现实可行性。反不正当竞争法虽然有局限性,但其及时、便捷和灵活的制度设计,扮演着十分重要的兜底性保护角色。针对我国现行《反不正当竞争法》对地理标志保护的立法疏漏和规则缺位,建议进一步修改《反不正当竞争法》第二章所列举的不正当竞争行为类型,增设地理标志不正当竞争条款,明确第17条中赔偿责任和第20条中诉讼主体的适用范围等,以加强对地理标志的反不正当竞争保护。There are abundant geographical indication resources with potential commercial and cultural values in China and strengthening their protection them is of great significance.Legally speaking,it is not just the exclusive territory of specialized and trademark laws.The Anti-unfair Competition Law also has legitimacy and necessity for protecting geographical indications.From the perspective of international rules and extraterritorial practices,the Law still has practical feasibility.Although it has limitations,the Law still plays a crucial role in providing a fallback protection with its timely,convenient,and flexible institutional design.In response to the legislative loopholes and rule gaps on the protection of geographical indications in China,it is suggested to further revise the types of unfair competition behaviors listed in Chapter 2 of the Anti-unfair Competition Law,to add provisions on unfair competition in geographical indications,to clarify the scope of compensation liability in Article 17 and the scope of application of litigation subjects in Article 20,in order to strengthen the anti-unfair competition in protecting geographical indications.

关 键 词：反不正当竞争法 地理标志 兜底性保护 列举式条款 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]