试析行政复议主渠道作用的理论与实践逻辑  

Analyzing the Theoretical and Practical Logic of the Primary Role of Administrative Reconsideration

作　　者：董玮佳 佟尧[1] Dong Weijia;Tong Yao

机构地区：[1]上海海事大学法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2025年第1期60-67,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：我国2023年《行政复议法》将行政复议定位为解决行政争议的主渠道,其理论逻辑的起点在于人民群众对于行政争议解决方式公正、高效、低成本的需求。行政复议相比于行政诉讼与信访,更能满足人民群众的诉求,所以其自然而然能够成为行政争议解决的主渠道。然而在实践中,行政复议的主渠道作用体现得并不明显,其主要原因是行政复议优势并未完全发挥,表现为与行政诉讼同质化明显,相比于信访也没有显著优势。所以行政复议主渠道作用发挥的实践逻辑在于强化行政复议的优势。2023年《行政复议法》在此道路上有所进步,但是仍有照顾不到的地方,需要进一步探索。The 2023 Administrative Reconsideration Law of China positions administrative reconsideration as the primary channel for resolving administrative disputes.The theoretical logic behind this lies in the public's demand for a fair,efficient,and low-cost method of resolving administrative disputes.Compared to administrative litigation and petitioning,administrative reconsideration better meets the needs of the public,making it a natural choice as the main channel for resolving administrative disputes.However,in practice,the primary role of administrative reconsideration is not yet evident,mainly because its advantages have not been fully realized.It shows significant homogenization with administrative litigation and lacks a clear advantage over petitioning.Therefore,the practical logic for realizing the primary role of administrative reconsideration lies in strengthening its advantages.While the 2023 Administrative Reconsideration Law has made progress in this direction,there are still areas that require further exploration and improvement.

关 键 词：行政复议 主渠道作用 行政调解 枫桥经验 

分 类 号：D912[政治法律—法学]