检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李璐桐 LI Lu-tong(Heilongjiang University,Harbin 151000,China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学,哈尔滨151000
出 处:《齐齐哈尔高等师范专科学校学报》2025年第1期81-85,共5页Journal of Qiqihar Teachers College
摘 要:我国民事诉讼审判形式的核心由独任制和合议制两大基石组成,它们各有千秋,共同支撑着司法的公正与效率。在过去的岁月里,我国法院一直坚守着“合议为主,独任为辅”的审判原则,既彰显了合议制的集体智慧,又凸显了独任制的灵活高效。然而,随着时代的快速发展,民事案件的数量激增,对审判工作提出了更高的要求和更大的挑战。本文从独任制的概念出发,深入剖析独任制扩张的理论基础,并结合司法实践的实际情况,全面探讨独任制扩张所面临的挑战及应对策略,以期为我国民事诉讼制度的不断完善提供有益的参考。The core of the trial system in civil litigation in China is composed of two main pillars:the sole-judge proceedings system and the collegial panel system.Each has its strengths,collectively supporting the fairness and efficiency of the judiciary.Over the years,Chinese courts have adhered to the principle of“collegiality as primary and the sole-judge proceedings as supplementary,”which highlights the collective wisdom of the collegial panel system while emphasizing the flexibility and efficiency of the sole-judge proceedings system.However,with the rapid development of the times,the number of civil cases has surged,posing higher demands and greater challenges for trial work.This paper starts with the concept of the sole-judge proceedings system,deeply analyzes the theoretical foundation for its expansion,and,in conjunction with the actual situation in judicial practice,comprehensively explores the challenges and coping strategies faced by the expansion of the sole-judge proceedings system,providing useful references for the continuous improvement of China’s civil litigation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49