中德多边网络平台反垄断法律规制比较研究  

A Comparative Study on the Anti-Monopoly Legal Regulation of Multilateral Online Platforms in China and Germany

作　　者：吕曾丹 胡淼 胡益杰 李西臣[1] Lyu Zengdan;Hu Miao;Hu Yijie;Li Xichen(School of Law and Sociology,Xihua University,Chengdu 610039)

机构地区：[1]西华大学法学与社会学学院,成都610039

出　　处：《西部学刊》2025年第6期126-129,共4页Journal of Western

基　　金：四川省2022年区域和国别重点研究基地——四川农业大学德国研究中心建设项目“中德多边网络平台反限制竞争政策比较研究”(编号:ZDF2207)的研究成果。

摘　　要：面对多边网络平台反垄断规制在相关产品市场的界定、市场力量的评估、行为违法性认定标准方面存在的困难,中德反垄断法积极做出了应对。德国采用“显著跨市场竞争影响力”突破了首先必须界定相关市场的限制;中国沿用界定相关市场作为首要步骤,但引入跨界竞争因素。中德反垄断法均加强了对数据因素在市场力量评估中的考量。德国法律重视消费者福利中的非价格因素作为行为违法性的认定标准,中国法律明确保护平台内消费者的合法权益。中国法律回应多边网络平台垄断挑战仍有较大改进空间。Faced with the difficulties in defining the relevant product market,assessing market power,and determining the standards for the abusive conduct in the anti-monopoly regulation of multilateral online platforms,the anti-monopoly laws in China and Germany have actively responded.Germany adopts the“Paramount cross-market significance”to break the restriction that the relevant market must be defined first,whereas China continues to define the relevant market as the first step,but introduces cross-market competition factors.Both the Chinese and German anti-monopoly laws have strengthened the consideration of data factors in the assessment of market power.German anti-monopoly law attaches importance to non-price factors in the consumer welfare theory as the criteria for abusive conduct,while Chinese ones explicitly protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers on the platform.Therefore,there remains much to be done for Chinese relevant laws to address the challenges of monopoly of online platforms.

关 键 词：多边网络平台 垄断 市场力量 消费者福利理论 

分 类 号：D93[政治法律—法学] D97D923.8