状态自尊量表在中国样本中的信效度分析与Rash模型测评  

Reliability analysis and Rash model measurement of the state self-esteem scale in a Chinese sample

作　　者：钱旭宏 QIAN Xuhong(School of Education and Psychology,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou 363000,China)

机构地区：[1]闽南师范大学教育与心理学院,福建漳州363000

出　　处：《心理月刊》2024年第23期87-89,共3页

摘　　要：目的 研究状态自尊量表(SSES)在中国青年人群中的应用。方法 本研究采用SSES对180名18~34岁中国青年施测进行项目分析,除第17项外(r=0.164),其他项目均有良好的内部一致信度(r>0.420)。正式施测时以罗森伯格自尊量表和CFPS2018中简版人格量表作为效标,对540名中国青年施测。结果 发现SSES效标关联效度良好(r=0.673~0.832),对中国青年的状态自尊预测效果较好。验证性因素分析发现各项目对各维度的解释与给定模型结构不一致(RMSEA=0.111),本土化的状态自尊量表维度有待进一步整合。用Rash模型进行项目质量分析,发现大多数项目拟合情况良好,项目信度为0.992,难度适中。结论 状态自尊量表对中国样本的施测表现良好。Objective To study the application of the state self-esteem scale(SSES)in Chinese youth.Methods In this study,180 Chinese youths aged 18~34 years were tested using SSES,and all other items had good internal consensus reliability(r>0.420)except for item 17(r=0.164).The Rosenberg self-esteem scale and the CFPS2018 Simplified Personality Scale were used as the standard to test 540 Chinese youths.Results It was found that the correlation validity of SSES was good(r=0.673~0.832),and the prediction effect of state self-esteem of Chinese youth was good.Confirmatory factor analysis found that the interpretation of each dimension of each item was inconsistent with the structure of the given model(RMSEA=0.111),and the dimension of the localized state self-esteem scale needed to be further integrated.The Rash model was used to analyze the project quality,and it was found that most of the projects were well fitted,with a project reliability of 0.992 and moderate difficulty.Conclusion The performance of the state self-esteem scale in the Chinese sample is in good condition.

关 键 词：状态自尊 自尊 情景自尊 

分 类 号：B84[哲学宗教—心理学]