检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李金 仇璐 刘锐 李军 李瀚屹 颜兵 何江[4] 梁贤金 易彪 LI Jin;QIU Lu;LIU Rui;LI Jun;LI Hanyi;YAN Bing;HE Jiang;LIANG Xianjin;YI Biao(Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited,Power China Group,Hangzhou 311122,China;School of Environmental Science and Engineering,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China;School of Chemical Engineering,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210094,China;Zhejiang Province Institute of Architectural Design and Research Co.,Ltd.,Hangzhou 310006,China;Changjiang Survey,Planning,Design,and Research Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430010,China;CITIC General Institute of Architectural Design and Research Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430014,China)
机构地区:[1]中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司,浙江杭州311122 [2]浙江工商大学环境科学与工程学院,浙江杭州310018 [3]南京理工大学化学与化工学院,江苏南京210094 [4]浙江省建筑设计研究院有限公司,浙江杭州310006 [5]长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司,湖北武汉430010 [6]中信建筑设计研究总院有限公司,湖北武汉430014
出 处:《工业水处理》2025年第3期121-128,共8页Industrial Water Treatment
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(21976158)。
摘 要:以杭州市某垃圾渗滤液处理设计的两种方案比选为例,全面分析了垃圾渗滤液处理系统特点,从垃圾渗滤液处理系统的安全性、可靠性和经济性3个目标层上综合考虑,建立垃圾渗滤液处理系统的模糊综合评价模型,确定目标层、属性层的评价因素,通过专家问卷调查方式收集获得模糊判断矩阵,计算目标层、属性层、方案层的权重,实现定量评价两种系统方案的目标。模型评价结果显示:采用氧化沟的设计方案A1比采用UNITANK的设计方案A2更好,并通过已建工程应用案例验证了方案A1确实优于方案A2。对于其他类似定性且难以定量的方案比选,均可以借鉴模糊综合评价模型进行评价。目标层和属性层考虑的因素越多,计算结果越准确,但计算难度也越大。该研究所采用的将定性问题转化为定量问题的方法,不仅具有可操作性,而且具有推广使用的价值。This study extensively analyzed the characteristics of landfill leachate treatment systems for the comparison and evaluation of design schemes.The analysis was based on two design schemes related to the landfill leachate treatment system in Hangzhou.Additionally,a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for landfill leachate treatment system design schemes was established,considering the three target levels of safety,reliability,and economy.The evaluation factors for the target and attribute layers were proposed after a thorough analysis.The weight coefficients for the target,attribute,and scheme layers were determined using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on a questionnaire survey of experts.The evaluation results indicated that the design scheme involving an oxidation ditch outperformed the UNITANK design in the landfill leachate treatment system.Compared with the actual engineering cases,scheme A1 was better than scheme A2.For other similar qualitative and difficult to quantify the selection of the program,it could be evaluated with the help of fuzzy comprehensive evalution model.The inclusion of multiple factors in the target and attribute layers increased the complexity of the calculation process but enhanced the accuracy of the results.The method of transforming qualitative schemes into quantitative ones,as presented in this study,is not only practical,but also widely applicable.
关 键 词:垃圾渗滤液 废水处理 方案比选 定量评价 定性评价
分 类 号:X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程] TU992[建筑科学—市政工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49