组织边界视角下学术创业企业发展的路径和策略分析——基于中美对比  

Development paths and strategies in academic entrepreneurship from the perspective of organizational boundaries:A US-China comparison

作　　者：李玉花 林雨昕 方玉霞 LI Yuhua;LIN Yuxin;FANG Yuxia(School of Economics,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China;Zhejiang Institute of“Eight-Eight”Strategies,Hangzhou 310018,China;College of Finance,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江财经大学经济学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]浙江省八八战略研究院,浙江杭州310018 [3]江西师范大学财政金融学院,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《创新与创业教育》2025年第1期74-83,共10页Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education

基　　金：浙江财经大学研究生精品课程建设项目“国际商务(双语)”(24JPKC0110)。

摘　　要：在技术革命与产业变革深度交融的全球大变局中,提高我国学术成果的转化率及推进学术创业企业发展迫在眉睫。但是,对于大学如何促进学术创业企业发展的认识还不充分。基于组织边界理论,围绕美国学术创业企业在组织边界方面的变化,系统地讨论了学术创业企业发展的路径和策略。同时,从前期孵化原因、具体发展措施以及后期商业化结果3个方面,对中美学术创业企业的发展路径进行对比分析。结果发现,我国的学术创业企业存在制度弹性缺乏、能力边界模糊、身份边界闭合等问题。在此基础上,提出推动我国学术创业企业发展的可行建议。Amid the global convergence of technological and industrial transformations,enhancing the transformation of academic achievements into practical applications in China is imperative.However,our understanding of how universities support and promote the development of academic entrepreneurship firms is still very insufficient.Based on the theory of organizational boundaries,this paper systematically discusses the mechanisms driving the development of academic entrepreneurship firms by focusing on the changes in the organizational boundaries of American academic entrepreneurship firms.Additionally,it compares the development paths of academic entrepreneurship firms between China and the United States from three aspects:early-stage incubation reasons,specific development measures,and later-stage commercialization outcomes.The research reveals that China faces challenges such as a lack of efficiency flexibility,blurred capacity boundaries,and relatively closed identity boundaries.Building upon these findings,feasible strategies for promoting the development of academic entrepreneurship firms in China are proposed.

关 键 词：组织边界 学术创业企业 中美对比 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]