算法官僚对行政法的影响及其治理  

The Impact of Algorithmic Bureaucracy on Administrative Law and Its Governance

作　　者：黄竹智 HUANG Zhu-zhi(School of Law,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou,225127,China)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏扬州225127

出　　处：《福建江夏学院学报》2025年第1期78-86,共9页Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学课题“习近平法治思想视角下省域法治建设与治理现代化关系研究”(2024SJSZ0890)。

摘　　要：算法治理正从以算法为规制对象向算法化规制需求转向。行政算法在本质上区别于被监管对象的算法,它不再是以数据为体、以智能算法为用、以人类自身为对象,转而以智能算法为体、以数据为用、以行政主体为对象。在以行政行为论、行政过程论与行政系统论对算法官僚的法律效果与性质的分析中,能够发现算法介入行政使得行政体系不断产生形变,而最终产生出对算法行政予以规范的治理需求。应依法规范构建算法行政主体,以技术性正当过程更新正当程序,以法治凝聚共识厘定算法行政行为边界。Algorithmic governance is shifting from regulating algorithms to meeting the demand for algorithmic regulation.Administrative algorithms are fundamentally different from the algorithms of regulated entities.Instead of being data-centric with intelligent algorithms as tools and humans as targets,administrative algorithms are algorithm-centric,using data as tools and targeting administrative bodies.In the analysis of the legal effects and nature of algorithmic bureaucracy from the perspectives by administrative behavior theory,administrative process theory,and administrative system theory,it can be found that algorithmic intervention in administration constantly deforms the administrative system,ultimately leading to the need for standardized governance of algorithmic administration.It is advisable to construct algorithmic administrative entities in accordance with laws and regulations,update due process with technical legitimacy,and define the boundaries of algorithmic administrative behavior through the rule of law to consolidate consensus.

关 键 词：算法官僚 算法行政权力 行政协议 人类行政保留 

分 类 号：TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程] D035[自动化与计算机技术—控制科学与工程]