安全学科科技期刊提升稿件初审质量的实践——以《中国安全科学学报》和《安全与环境学报》为例  

Practice of improving the quality of manuscript first review in science and technology journals of safety subject:taking China Safety Science Journal and Journal of Safety and Environment as examples

作　　者：刘娇 钱金鑫 LIU Jiao;QIAN Jinxin(Editorial Department of China Safety Science Journal,China Occupational Safety and Health Association,100029,Beijing,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]中国职业安全健康协会《中国安全科学学报》编辑部,北京100029 [2]中国矿业大学(北京)应急管理与安全工程学院,北京100083 [3]北京理工大学《安全与环境学报》编辑部,北京100089

出　　处：《编辑学报》2025年第1期101-105,共5页Acta Editologica

基　　金：中国科协2023年度分领域发布高质量科技期刊分级目录项目。

摘　　要：安全学科类科技期刊因其学科覆盖面广、交叉性强,为初审带来一定难度,也对初审提出更高要求。本文尝试以中国职业安全健康协会主办的《中国安全科学学报》和《安全与环境学报》2大典型安全类科技期刊为例,在分析两刊初审存在的弊端并分析其致因的基础上,从稿件角度——六维度助力稿件初审、“主角”角度——双轨制夯实编辑内能、外援角度——三梯度借力编委队伍3个方面来重塑科学初审流程,以探索一条适合安全学科并能为综合类科技期刊初审提供镜鉴的特色初审之路。Due to their extensive subject matter and significant intersections,security science and technology journals pose certain challenges and heightened demands for the initial review process.To address this,this paper undertakes an examination of China Safety Science Journal and Journal of Safety and Environment,two exemplary publications sponsored by the China Occupational Safety and Health Association.By analyzing the shortcomings in the initial review of these journals and their underlying causes,the paper proposes a multifaceted approach to enhance the review process.Specifically,it introduces six dimensions for manuscript prescreening,adopts a dual-track system from the“protagonist”perspective to strengthen internal editorial capabilities,and leverages a three-tier strategy through external assistance from the editorial board to reshape the scientific initial review framework.The aim is to explore a distinctive pre-review pathway tailored for security disciplines and comprehensive science and technology journals.

关 键 词：初审 安全学科类期刊 《中国安全科学学报》 《安全与环境学报》 综合类科技期刊 

分 类 号：G23[文化科学]