释传抄古文中的“嬉”与“虔”  

On the Interpretation of Xi and Qian in Transcribed Ancient Scripts

作　　者：孙超杰 Sun Chaojie

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院古籍研究所

出　　处：《出土文献》2025年第1期132-138,173,共8页Excavated Documents

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“阜阳汉简整理与研究”(21&ZD305);国家社科基金青年项目“传抄古文疑难字考释与研究”(24CYY014);全国高等院校古籍整理研究工作委员会项目“《集篆古文韵海》释证”(2439)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：传抄古文中的“嬉”写作“■(四1·20乂)”,旧多无善解。我们以为此形当即“毐”字,“毐”与“嬉”是音近通假的关系。宋本《玉篇》收“娭”字古文作“”,正是“毐”字,与“嬉”字古文写作“毐”亦相合。《古文四声韵》收“虔”字隶定古文作“■(四2·6崔)”,一般以为属“虐”字误植。我们认为“■”当即“茍(敬)”字之隶讹,与“虔”是义近换用的关系。The character xi嬉in transcribed ancient scripts is written as■,which has traditionally defied satisfactory interpretation.We propose that this character form corresponds to the character ai毐,suggesting a phonetic loan relationship between ai and xi.The Song edition of Yu pian玉篇records the ancient script form of the character xi/ai娭as毒,aligning with the character ai.This supports the hypothesis that the ancient form of xi is written as ai毐.Similarly,Guwen sisheng yun古文四声韵records the clerical script form of the character qian虔as■,which is often thought to be a mistaken transcription of nue虐.We argue that■is instead a clerical misrepresentation of the character jing茍(敬),which has a synonymous or closely related semantic usage to qian.

关 键 词：嬉 毐 虔 茍(敬) 义近换用 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]