检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭进国 王玫萍 刘佳 鲁民巧 Guo Jinguo;Wang Meiping;Liu Jia;Lu Minqiao(Hebei Vocational University of Technology and Engineering,Xingtai,Hebei 054035,China)
机构地区:[1]河北科技工程职业技术大学,河北邢台054035
出 处:《河北科技工程职业技术大学学报》2025年第1期110-114,共5页Journal of Xingtai Polytechnic College
基 金:邢台市重点研发计划自筹项目——“增程式电动汽车整车控制器的开发与测试研究”,项目编号:2023ZC011。
摘 要:针对电动汽车再生制动系统能量回收效率低的问题,主要研究了电动汽车再生制动系统的工作原理,分析和比较了三种不同的电动汽车制动混合策略的能量回收效果。利用Amesim软件建立了电动汽车再生制动系统及其混合策略的仿真模型,分析了影响电动汽车再生制动系统能量回收效率的关键因素。结果表明,在文中所示的工况和条件下,串联式混合策略优势明显,串联式混合策略能量效率最高,并联式混合策略能量效率居中,混联式能量效率最低。In order to solve the problem of low energy recovery efficiency of electric vehicle regenerative braking system,this paper mainly studies the working principle of electric vehicle regenerative braking system,and analyzes and compares the energy recovery effect of three different electric vehicle braking hybrid strategies.Amesim software was used to establish a simulation model of the regenerative braking system of electric vehicles and its hybrid strategy,and the key factors affecting the energy recovery efficiency of the regenerative braking system of electric vehicles were analyzed.The results show that under the working conditions and conditions shown in this paper,the tandem hybrid strategy has obvious advantages,the tandem hybrid strategy has the highest energy efficiency,the parallel hybrid strategy has the middle energy efficiency,and the hybrid hybrid strategy has the lowest energy efficiency.
分 类 号:U469.72[机械工程—车辆工程] U463.526[交通运输工程—载运工具运用工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15