检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙建伟 Sun Jianwei
机构地区:[1]上海市法学会,上海200050
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2025年第1期122-131,共10页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目(23AFX014)“个人数据交易的私法构造研究”。
摘 要:当下关于公共视频监控的制度构造,存在侵犯个人隐私和数据滥用等风险,尤其是个人隐私领域多倾向于私法保护,忽视了对公权力的控制,引发个人隐私保护的制度困境。限制公权力以保护私权利,成为解决数字支配问题的法律进路。必须对公共视频监控的法律边界作出明确划分,厘清公权力与私权利的界限,确立个人隐私保护的标准规则,进而构建控制公共视频监控的制度体系,以划定个人隐私保护与公共视频监控的法律边界,从而有效维护个人隐私,保障人之尊严。When reflecting on the current legal structure of public video surveillance,the risks of privacy infringement and data abuse have exposed the deficiencies of the existing system.Particularly in the field of personal privacy protection,there is a tendency to rely on private law protection while neglecting the control of public power,which has triggered the predicament of personal privacy protection.Hence,restricting public power and thereby safeguarding private rights has emerged as the legal avenue for addressing the issue of digital domination.It is imperative to clearly demarcate the legal boundaries of public video surveillance,distinguish the boundaries between public power and private rights,establish a standard rule system for personal privacy protection,and subsequently construct an institutional system for controlling public video surveillance,in order to define the legal boundaries of personal privacy protection and public video surveillance,thereby effectively safeguarding personal privacy and guaranteeing human dignity.
关 键 词:“数维坦” 公共视频监控 个人隐私保护 个人信息保护 个人信息收集
分 类 号:D911.01[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120