检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何承斌 戴晨曦 He Chengbin;Dai Chenxi(School of Law,Anqing Normal University,Anqing City,Anhui Province,246000)
出 处:《黄河科技学院学报》2025年第3期73-77,共5页Journal of Huanghe S&T College
基 金:安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目(AHSKY2020D89)。
摘 要:保护作品完整权的侵权判定主要有客观标准与主观标准,两种标准争论的根源在于如何平衡作者的人格利益和财产利益。我国保护作品完整权侵权判定中应适用主观标准,通过厘清改编作品和原作品的联结界限、明确思想受损所要求达到的程度、统一侵权判断的法律标准、优化举证责任等措施,搭建起保护作品完整权侵权判定所适用主观标准的具体框架。The infringement determination for the right of integrity of works mainly involves objective and subjective standards,and the root of the debate between the two standards lies in how to balance the author’s personal interest and property interest.In China,the subjective standard should be applied in determining infringement of the right of integrity.Through the measures such as clarifying the boundaries between adapted works and original works,specifying the extent of damage to the work’s content,unifying the legal standard for infringement determination,and optimizing the burden of proof,it is possible to establish a specific framework for applying the subjective standard in determining the infringement of the right of integrity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.229.54