论粤港澳区际行政协议的性质与效力  

On the Nature and Validity of the Inter-regional Administrative Agreements in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

作　　者：董皞 程斌 DONG Hao;CHENG Bin

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2025年第2期117-128,共12页Administrative Law Review

基　　金：2023年度北京师范大学法学院学术型研究生专项科研基金课题“粤港澳大湾区区际行政协议的性质及效力研究”(项目批准号:2023LAW011)。

摘　　要：为了充分发挥区际行政协议在粤港澳合作中的独特价值,必须对其性质和效力加以明确。以协议内容能否直接执行为标准,可将粤港澳区际行政协议划分为规则类协议与规划类协议,需要分别认定两类协议的性质和效力。规则类协议属于行政契约,当前仅具备软性约束力,基于诚实信用原则和对公共利益的维护,应当赋予其法律效力,短期内可由全国人大常委会作出决定予以批准,未来则可以考虑授予行政机关缔约权并赋予规则类协议法律渊源的地位。规划类协议只有契约之形而无契约之实,属于一种特殊的政策性文件,不应产生法律效力。In order to give full play to the unique value of inter-regional administrative agreements in the cooperation among Guangdong,Hong Kong,and Macao,it is necessary to clarify their nature and validity.Taking whether the content of the agreement can be directly implemented as the standard,the inter-regional administrative agreements in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area can be divided into rule-type agreements and plan-type agreements,and the nature and validity of these two types of agreements need to be recognized respectively.Rule-type agreements belong to administrative contract,and currently only have soft binding force.Based on the principle of good faith and the protection of public interests,they should be given legal effect.In the short term,the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress can make a decision to approve them,and in the future,it can be considered to grant the administrative organs the right to conclude contracts and give rule-type agreements the status of legal sources.Plan-type agreements have only the form of contracts but not the essence of contracts,and are a special type of policy-related document,which should not produce legal effects.

关 键 词：粤港澳区际行政协议 行政契约 政策性文件 协议效力 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]