检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曲红梅[1] 于国伟[1] 魁发瑞[1] 海向军[1] Qu Hongmei;Yu Guowei;Kui Farui;Hai Xiangjun(Faculty of Medicine,Northwest Minzu University,Lanzhou 730000,Gansu,China)
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2025年第1期93-94,97,共3页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:西北民族大学教改项目(2021XJYBJG-107);西北民族大学一流课程,课程思政示范课程(2022KCSZKC-88);甘肃省卫健委行业科研计划(GSWSKY2023-60)。
摘 要:目的:通过比较传统教学法和线上线下教学方法的教学效果,为进一步教学改革提供参考。方法:以2017级临床专业168名学生和2018级临床专业181名学生为研究对象,进行学生成绩的对比分析,以及学生教学质量评价的分析。结果:试验组预防医学成绩明显高于对照组,组间差异明显(P<0.05);而在授课教学质量评价方面,试验组数据明显优于对照组,组间差异明显(P<0.05)。结论:预防医学混合教学模式提高了学生学习的积极性,提高了教学效果,增强了学生提出问题、分析问题的能力。Objective:To provide insights for further teaching reform by comparing the teaching effects of traditional and online-offline mixed teaching methods.Methods:The study involved 168 clinical medicine students from the 2017 cohort and 181 clinical medicine students from the 2018 cohort.Performance comparisons and evaluations of teaching quality were analyzed.Results:The experimental group,which used the online-offline mixed teaching model,achieved significantly higher scores in preventive medicine compared to the control group,with a significant difference(P<0.05).In terms of teaching quality evaluation,the experimental group also scored significantly higher than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The mixed teaching model of preventive medicine improves students'learning enthusiasm,enhances teaching outcomes,and strengthens students'ability to ask and analyze questions.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42