检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王海稳 王晓发 WANG Haiwen;WANG Xiaofa(School of Marxism,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学马克思主义学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期52-58,共7页Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(21AKS016);浙江省大学生科技创新活动计划(2024R407B057)。
摘 要:精准治理是网络意识形态安全治理的导向目标,大数据强劲赋能为网络意识形态安全精准治理提供了技术支撑和时代机遇。大数据与网络意识形态安全精准治理间具有主体共通、技术联通和内容互通的内在契合,为网络意识形态安全精准治理提供依据。但大数据赋能网络意识形态安全精准治理过程中仍存在精准治理多元主体缺位、精准治理数字风险泛化、精准治理理念认识不足等诸多现实困境,需从创新多元参与治理新范式、开拓风险预警治理新路径、树立全局性战略治理理念三方面精准发力,协同推进网络空间意识形态安全的建设发展。Precise governance is the guiding objective of cyber ideological security governance,and the powerful empowerment of big data provides both technological support and opportunities for the era of precise governance in cyber ideological security.There is an inherent alignment between big data and the precise governance of cyber ideological security,characterized by shared subjectivity,technological connectivity,and content interoperability,which forms the basis for such governance.However,challenges still exist in the process of big data empowerment for precise governance,including the absence of diverse governance subjects,the broadening of digital risks in governance,and insufficient understanding of the governance concept.To address these challenges,it is necessary to focus on three key aspects:innovating new paradigms for multi-party participation in governance,exploring new paths for risk warning and governance,and establishing a comprehensive strategic governance concept.These efforts will work synergistically to promote the development and construction of ideological security in cyberspace.
分 类 号:G641[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229