检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马绎 MA Yi(School of Foreign Languages,Hangzhou University of Electronic Science and Technology,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学外国语学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期68-78,共11页Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(20CSS027)。
摘 要:通过对比研究东西两德的家庭政策,分析了不同模式下的家庭政策对女性就业率和人口出生率的影响。研究发现,西德家庭政策倾向于育儿的“再家庭化”,部分职业女性因此被迫推迟或放弃生育,女性就业率提升的同时陷入低生育率陷阱;东德家庭政策以育儿的“去家庭化”为宗旨,促进了女性就业率和人口出生率的同步提升。借鉴东西德在家庭政策方面的经验和教训,我国可构建“工作-家庭友好型”的家庭政策体系,以促进人口结构的长期均衡发展。This paper compares the family policies of East and West Germany,analyzing their effects on female employment rates and birth rates under different models.The study finds that West Germany s family policy tends toward the“re-familization”of childrearing,which has forced some professional women to delay or forgo childbirth.As a result,while female employment rates have increased,they have fallen into the trap of low fertility rates.In contrast,East Germany s family policy emphasized the“de-familization”of childrearing,which led to a simultaneous increase in both female employment rates and birth rates.Drawing on the experiences and lessons from both East and West Germany,China could build a“work-family friendly”family policy system to promote the long-term balanced development of its population structure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33