皇都的意义——辽上京城建置所见契丹开国的统驭方略  

The Significance of the Imperial Capital:Strategies of Governance in the Khitan Founding as Reflected in the Construction of Liao Shangjing City

作　　者：邱靖嘉[1] Qiu Jingjia

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学历史学院

出　　处：《北方文物》2025年第1期94-102,共9页Northern Cultural Relics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“北族王朝历史书写视野下的金朝开国史研究”(批准号:21BZS057)资助成果。

摘　　要：辽上京临潢府乃是辽朝“五京”之首,尝有“皇都”之号,至少在辽前期应是名副其实的国都,与移动式捺钵行政中枢构成“双政治中心”。辽朝“皇都”存在的意义,并不在于皇帝是否长期驻留理政,而在于作为一个新规划的都城,在城市形制和建筑布局上如何体现国家治理的方式和意志,从中可以反映出契丹开国的制度模式与统驭方略。通过将文献记载与考古发现相结合,揭橥“皇都”之于辽朝统治国内多族群的政治意涵,亦有助于重审北族王朝的“汉化”命题。Liao Shangjing,Linhuang Fu,as the foremost among the"Five Capitals"of the Liao dynasty,was honored with the title of"Imperial Capital."At least in the early period of the Liao dynasty,it functioned as the de facto national capital,forming a"dual political center"alongside the mobile Nabo administrative central authority.The significance of the Liao"Imperial Capital"does not lie in whether the emperor resided there for extended periods to govern,but in how this newly planned capital reflected the methods and intentions of state governance through its urban form and architectural layout.This reveals the institutional model and governance strategies employed during the founding of the Khitan state.By integrating documentary records with archaeological findings,this study explores the political implications of the"Imperial Capital"in the Liao dynasty's rule over a multi-ethnic empire.It also contributes to revisiting the topic of"Sinicization"in northern nomadic dynasties.

关 键 词：辽上京 皇都 统驭方略 国家治理 

分 类 号：K246.1[历史地理—历史学]