证据法视角下审查逮捕证明体系的三维审视  

A Three-Dimensional Review of the Arrest Proof System from the Perspective of Evidence Law

作　　者：贺言 He Yan(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生论丛》2024年第6期55-61,共7页Journal of the Postgraduates of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：为进一步降低审前羁押率、提升羁押治理水平,有必要再度审视逮捕要件的证明以澄清相关疑问。规范层面,刑罚要件、社会危险性要件并不具备证据法视角下的事实属性,并非严格意义上的证明对象;同时逮捕要件的证明标准并不明晰,是否具备司法证明的性质亦有待证成。应将审查逮捕的证明对象厘定为基础事实,并运用推定将其与证明结论联结。同时,在尊重诉讼规律的前提下,事实要件与刑罚要件的证明应采高度盖然性标准,而社会危险性要件的证明宜采证据确实、充分标准。此外,由于审查者的中立性以及证明责任的存在,审查逮捕之司法证明的性质应当予以正名。In order to further reduce the pre-trial detention rate and improve the level of detention governance,it is necessary to re-examine the proof of arrest to clarify relevant doubts.In terms of regulations,the elements of penalty and social risk do not have the attributes of facts from the perspective of evidence law and are not the objects of proof in the strict sense.At the same time,the proof standard of arrest is not clear,and whether it possesses the nature of judicial proof is also to be considered.The object of proof for examining arrest should be defined as basic facts,which was linked to the proof conclusion through logical construction.Meanwhile,on the premise of respecting the law of litigation,it can be determined that the proof of factual and penalty elements should adopt the high probability standard,while the proof of social risk elements should adopt the standard of certainty and sufficient evidence.In addition,due to the neutrality of the judge of arrest and the existence of the burden of proof,the nature of the judicial proof of arrest should be justified.

关 键 词：审查逮捕 证明对象 证明标准 司法证明 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]