基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的株洲石峰公园景观质量评价研究  

Evaluation of Landscape Quality of Zhuzhou Shifeng Park Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method

作　　者：羿翰霖 YI Han-lin(Hunan University of Technology,Zhuzhou 412007,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南工业大学,湖南株洲412007

出　　处：《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2025年第2期11-17,共7页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering

摘　　要：针对城市公园景观同质化及功能失衡等问题,以科学量化的方法评估公园景观质量,为公园的规划设计及管理提供指导。以株洲石峰公园为研究对象,基于AHP-FCE法从生态环境质量B_(1)、景观美学价值B_(2)、设施与服务B_(3)、人文景观效益B_(4)四个准则层设定21项具体评价指标,构建评价模型。通过专家问卷调查确定各指标权重,运用模糊综合评价法对公园景观质量进行综合评价。结果表明:4个评价方向权重排序依次为B_(1)(0.4570)>B_(3)(0.2482)>B_(2)(0.1683)>B_(4)(0.1265),得分排序依次为B_(1)(4.0378)>B_(2)(2.7805)>B_(4)(2.3675)>B_(3)(2.3049),石峰公园景观质量综合评价得分为3.1848,评价等级为“良好”。Aiming at the problems of homogenization and functional imbalance of urban park landscapes,a scientific and quantitative method is used to assess the quality of park landscapes and guide the planning,design,and management of parks.Taking Zhuzhou Shifeng Park as the research object,based on the AHP-FCE method,21 specific evaluation indexes are set from four criteria layers,namely,ecological environment quality B_(1),landscape aesthetic value B_(2),facilities and services B_(3),a nd humanistic landscape benefit B_(4),and the evaluation model is constructed.The weights of the indicators were determined through expert questionnaires,and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was applied to evaluate the park landscape quality comprehensively.The results show that:the order of weights of the four evaluation directions is B_(1)(0.4570)>B_(3)(0.2482)>B_(2)(0.1683)>B_(4)(0.1265),and the order of scores is B_(1)(4.0378)>B_(2)(2.7805)>B_(4)(2.3675)>B_(3)(2.3049),and the comprehensive score of landscape quality of Shifeng Park is 3.1848,the evaluation grade is“General”.

关 键 词：AHP FCE 景观质量评价 石峰公园 株洲市 

分 类 号：TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]