检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭世强 TAN Shiqiang(School of Law,Huainan Normal University,Huainan 232038,China)
出 处:《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期1-6,共6页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
基 金:安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“创新驱动发展战略视阈下知识产权保护研究”(SK2021A0559)。
摘 要:人工智能技术被视为新质生产力的“引擎”。中央经济工作会议提出要加快推动人工智能发展,以人工智能为引领培育新质生产力。生成式人工智能正在变革传统“作品”的产出方式,同时也引发了关于其生成物在当前著作权制度下的属性定位和权属分配等诸多争议,著作权法须对此作出积极回应。学界应对“作者—作品”观念进行再认识,采用客观独创性标准确认其“作品”之属性,将人工智能生成物的著作权主体确定为人类,并在当前制度框架下统一规则以确定其权属分配。Artificial intelligence technology is regarded as the“engine”of new quality productivity.The Central Economic Work Conference proposed to accelerate the development of artificial intelligence and cultivate new quality productivity with artificial intelligence as the guide.However,in changing the traditional way of producing“works”,generative artificial intelligence has also sparked many controversies about the attribute positioning and ownership allocation of artificial intelligence generated works under the current copyright system.The Copyright Law needs to respond positively to this situation.It requires to redefine the concept of“author-works”,adopt objective originality standards to confirm the attributes of its“works”,determine the copyright subject of artificial intelligence generated works as humans,and establish unified rules under the current institutional framework to determine their ownership allocation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43