盗伐林木罪司法适用中的问题及解决思路  

Issues and Perfection in the Judicial Application of the Crime of Illegal Logging of Trees

作　　者：霍孟杨 姚贝[1] Huo Mengyang;Yao Bei(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Beijing Forestry University,100083,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学人文社会科学学院,100083

出　　处：《北京林业大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期105-110,共6页Journal of Beijing Forestry University :Social Sciences

摘　　要：《最高人民法院关于审理破坏森林资源刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》在国家首个生态日(2023年8月15日)开始施行。该解释对盗伐林木罪的行为方式和入罪标准重新作了规定,但对盗伐林木罪是否属于目的犯、既遂标准应如何认定、盗伐行为是否包含“盗挖”行为、盗窃罪和盗伐林木罪的关系等问题仍存在较大争议。应明确盗伐林木罪不以“非法占有为目的”,从法益角度把握盗伐林木罪的既遂标准,明确盗伐行为应包含“盗挖”行为,并正确认识盗伐林木罪和盗窃罪的想象竞合关系,以进一步完善盗伐林木罪的司法适用。The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Criminal Cases of Destruction of Forest Resources has come into effect since the first National Ecological Day(August 15,2023).This explanation has redefined the behavior and criteria for the crime of illegal logging of trees,added conversion rules and value standards for the volume of standing trees and the number of young trees,and clarified the nature of dead trees.However,there is still significant controversy over whether the crime of illegal logging belongs to the offence to intent,the standard of achievement,whether the illegal logging behavior includes"illegal excavation",and the relationship between larceny and the crime of illegal logging of trees.It should be clarified that the crime of illegal logging is not aimed at"illegal possession".From the perspective of legal interests,the standard of achievement for the crime of illegal logging should be grasped.It should be clarified that illegal logging behavior should include"illegal excavation",and the imaginative competition relationship between the crime of illegal logging and larceny should be correctly understood,in order to further improve the judicial application of the crime of illegal logging.

关 键 词：以非法占有为目的 犯罪既遂标准 想象竞合犯 

分 类 号：D922.63[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]