检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李芷芮 蒋敏桃 王世宇 杨胜 LI Zhirui;JIANG Mintao;WANG Shiyu;YANG Sheng(School of Pharmacy,Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Sichuan Chengdu 611137,China;Sichuan Provincial Administration of Drug,Sichuan Chengdu 610017,China;School of Public Health,Chengdu University of TraditionalChinese Medicine,Sichuan Chengdu 611137,China)
机构地区:[1]成都中医药大学药学院,四川成都611137 [2]四川省药品监督管理局,四川成都610017 [3]成都中医药大学公共卫生学院,四川成都611137
出 处:《中药与临床》2025年第1期60-66,共7页Pharmacy and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica
基 金:四川省中医药管理局科学技术研究专项课题(2023MS397)。
摘 要:目的:通过对近二十余年(2002~023年)的政策文本进行归纳整理,对国家、四川省、D市三层级发布的中医药传承创新相关政策进行研究,分析四川省作为政策执行中承上启下的中观层面,在中医药传承创新方面政策体系的特点和不足之处,为后续中医药创新与传承政策的完善提供思路。方法:本研究采用基于政策工具的内容分析法,借助Nvivo质性分析软件,对政策进行编码分类,统计分析政策工具的运用情况,并对结果进行ThemeRiver方法的可视化分析。结果:四川省与其上下层级表现出对供给型工具(占比均大于35%)的重点关注,而缺少使用需求型政策工具(占比均小于27%);在政策工具的使用中都具有明显的“层级阶段滞后性”特征和“层级内容重点不匹配性”特征。结论:四川省在中医药传承创新政策的政策工具的运用中,与上下级的协同性有待提升,应该均衡使用各类政策工具,并优化政策内部结构,缩短产业政策传导的时滞,完善四川省中医药传承创新政策。Objective:By summarizing and organizing the policy texts of the past twenty years(2002-2023)and studying the policies related to the inheritance and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine issued at the three levels of the State,Sichuan province,and D City,we analyze the characteristics and deficiencies of the policy system in the inheritance and innovation of traditional Chinese medicine in Sichuan Province,as a mesoscopic level that carries on the implementation of the policy,so as to provide ideas for the improvement of the subsequent policies on the innovation and inheritance of traditional Chinese medicine.Methods:This study adopted the content analysis method based on policy tools,coded and classified policies with the help of Nvivo qualitative analysis software,statistically analyzed the use of policy tools,and visualized and analyzed the results with the ThemeRiver method.Results:Sichuan Province and its upper and lower levels showed a focus on supply-type tools(both greater than 35%)and a lack of use of demand-type policy tools(both less than 27%).The use of policy tools was characterized by a clear“lag in the stage of the hierarchy”and a“mismatch in the focus of the hierarchy”.The use of policy tools was characterized by a clear“lag in the stage of the hierarchy”and a“mismatch in the focus of the hierarchy”.The use of policy instruments was characterized by a clear“hierarchical stage lag”and“hierarchical content focus mismatch”.Conclusion:In the use of policy tools for TCM inheritance and innovation policy in Sichuan Province,the synergy with the upper and lower levels needs to be improved,and various policy tools should be used in a balanced way,and the internal structure of the policy should be optimized to shorten the time lag of the transmission of industrial policy and to improve the TCM inheritance and innovation policy in Sichuan Province.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.247.50