甲骨文旧释“蜀”字平议兼论“旬”字构形  

Review on the Old Interpretation of the Word“Shu(蜀)”in Oracle Bone Inscriptions and Demonstrate the Configuration of the Word“Xun(旬)”

作　　者：张卉 吴毅强[2,3] Zhang Hui;Wu Yiqiang(School of Literature and Journalism,Chengdu Normal University,Chengdu 611130;School of Historyand Culture,Ancient Chinese Characters and Pre-Qin History Research Center,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064)

机构地区：[1]成都师范学院文学与新闻学院,四川成都611130 [2]四川大学历史文化学院,四川成都610064 [3]四川大学古文字与先秦史研究中心,四川成都610064

出　　处：《中国文字研究》2024年第2期1-6,共6页The Study of Chinese Characters

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“新修甲骨文字典”(编号20&ZD306);成都师范学院引进人才专项项目“战国竹书郑国史料研究”(编号YJRC2020-08);成都师范学院高级别科研项目培育专项“战国竹书所见商周史料整理与研究”(编号CS23XMPY0102)阶段性成果

摘　　要：通过梳理商周甲骨文、金文,认为孙诒让最早所释殷墟甲骨文中的“蜀”字存在问题,于省吾、陈梦家、林沄等改释为“■(旬)”较为合理。“旬”的早期形体应作“■”,后省变成“■”形,应是某种动物的象形字,至于取象于何种动物,则遽难论定。从甲骨文实际用例来看,“■”多表示方国名(子组除外),“■”表示时间词,可用异体分工来解释这种现象。By sorting out the oracle bone inscriptions and bronze inscriptions in Shang and Zhou dynasties,it was thought that there was a problem with the word“shu(蜀)”in the Yin Xu Oracle bone inscriptions originally interpreted by Sun Yirang,and it was reasonable to change it to“xun[旬(旬)]”by Yu Xingwu,Chen Mengjia and Lin Yun.The early form of the“xun(旬)”should be“■”,and later omitted into the shape“■”,which should be a pictographic character of some animal,as to which animal to take the image of,it is difficult to decide.From the actual use case of oracle,“■”mostly represents the name of the country(except for Zi groups),“■”represents the time word,which can be explained by heterotopic division of labor.

关 键 词：蜀 ■ 旬 

分 类 号：K87[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]