据出土和传世文献看上古汉语“趣”“趋”的历时演变  

The Diachronic Evolution of“Qu(趣)”and“Qu(趋)”in Extant Texts of Archaic Chinese

作　　者：郭乐琳 Guo Lelin(Center for Research on Chinese Excavated Classics and Paleography,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学出土文献与古文字研究中心,上海200433

出　　处：《中国文字研究》2024年第2期176-183,共8页The Study of Chinese Characters

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“先秦至南北朝官私玺印集存”(编号:22&ZD263)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：“趣”和“趋”的关系为何,历来有不同看法。本文对出土和传世文献中“趣”“趋”的使用情况进行了全面考察,发现传世文献中“疾走”“趋向”二义上“趋”的用例皆多于“趣”,出土文献中则经历了从先秦时期只用“趣”到汉以后“趣”“趋”并用的阶段。“趣”“趋”当为一组音义皆近的同源词,过去看作异体字或通假字的说法不可信。The relationship between“Qu(趣)”and“Qu(趋)”in archaic Chinese have been a topic of debate in the literature.This paper conducts a comprehensive examination of the usage of“Qu(趣)”and“Qu(趋)”in both excavated and handed down documents,and finds that the use of“Qu(趋)”with the meanings of“rapid walking”and“tending towards”is more frequent than that of“Qu(趣)”in handed down documents,while in the excavated documents,the usage has gone through a process from only using“Qu(趣)”in the early Warring States Period to using both“Qu(趣)”and“Qu(趋)”together after the Han Dynasty.“Qu(趣)”and“Qu(趋)”should be a group of homologous cognates with similar sounds and meanings,and previous arguments that they should be regarded as allograph or borrowed graph is not credible.

关 键 词：趣 趋 出土文献 同源词 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]