德国汉学范式的“仿变”与“桥常”——以“中国文学史”研究为中心的讨论  

The“Imitation and Transformation”and“Bridging the Constant”in the German Sinological Paradigm:A Discussion Centered on the Study of“Chinese Literary History”

作　　者：叶隽[1] Ye Jun

机构地区：[1]同济大学人文学院

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2025年第1期88-102,共15页Chinese Culture Research

摘　　要：本文以德国汉学家对中国文学史的研究为中心,重点考察肖特的《中国文学纲要》、顾路柏与卫礼贤的双线路径、施寒微与顾彬的《中国文学史》工程等个案,同时也关注旁逸斜出的影响现象,其他中国文学史的撰作。最后讨论德国汉学建构过程中的研究范式问题,以“仿变”“桥常”与“断裂”等概念来勾勒其某种明显特征,并纳入美国汉学等相关中国文学史撰作作为参照,以更好地理解德国汉学范式的得失所在。This article focuses on the study of Chinese literary history by German Sinologists.It particularly examines specific cases such as Schott’s Outline of Chinese Literature, the dual⁃pathapproach of Wolfgang Kubin and Richard Wilhelm, and the History of Chinese Literature projectsby Wolfgang Behr and Wolfgang Kubin. It also takes into account the peripheral influences andother writings on Chinese literary history. Finally, the article discusses the research paradigms inthe construction of German Sinology. By using concepts such as “imitation and transformation,”“bridging the constant,” and “rupture” to outline the distinct characteristics of German Sinology.The study incorporates comparisons with related works on Chinese literary history from AmericanSinology to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of the German Sinological paradigm.

关 键 词：德国汉学 中国文学史 学术史 侨易学 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]