检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Ada Farai Shaba Goodson Masheka
机构地区:[1]School of Engineering&Technology,Mulungushi University,Kabwe,Zambia
出 处:《Urban Lifeline》2024年第1期62-72,共11页城市生命线(英文)
摘 要:The development of Zambia has brought increased large-scale infrastructure construction that has necessitated the need for improved foundation techniques that are both economical and adequate in capacity.Clay and soft soils with low bearing capacities and high compressibility could render structural foundations to perform poorly and shorten the design life of the bridges and structures.This study used a bridge case study in Northern Province,Zambia to investigate the use of geosynthetic encased columns(GECs)to support the bridge embankments to reduce differential settlements.End bearing fully encased columns were compared to floating columns of varying lengths by numerical modelling in PLAXIS 3D.The Hardening Soil and Mohr–Coulomb soil models were used for the column surrounding soil and the GECs in the finite element analysis.The results showed that the end bearing columns had the least differential settlements at the soil surface,whilst the reduction in floating column length increased the punching settlements.Moreover,the shear stress along the interface of the GECs and surrounding soil varied from 20 kN/m2 to 142 kN/m2,where the end bearing GEC had the least shear stress.
关 键 词:Ground improvement Geosynthetic encased columns SETTLEMENTS Numerical modelling Finite element analysis
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49