清中期取向不同的骈文复古派  

The Different Orientations of the Parallel Prose Retro Schools in the Mid-Qing Dynasty

作　　者：于景祥 胡继涛 YU Jingxiang;HU Jitao(School of Literature and Journalism,Inner Mongolia Minzu University,Tongliao 028043,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古民族大学文学与新闻传播学院,内蒙古通辽028043

出　　处：《内蒙古民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第2期1-7,共7页Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“中国骈文批评通史”(项目编号:22&ZD259)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在清代骈文领域,着力师法古人的复古思潮一直占据着重要的地位,并且由此形成了众多的骈文流派。特别是到了乾嘉时期,不仅复古的思潮更加盛行,而且在复古派的内部,又划分出多个骈文流派:既有师法范围较广的魏晋派、六朝派、三唐派、两宋派;又有师法范围较小的初唐派、中晚唐派以及北宋派、南宋派等等。在师古的总趋势之下,其师法对象有所不同,形成比较复杂的局面,需要我们进行梳理。In the realm of parallel prose during the Qing Dynasty,the trend of restoring classical models consistently held a prominent position,giving rise to multiple literary schools.Particularly during the Qianlong and Jiaqing periods,the retro movement not only gained increasing popularity but also diversified internally,forming various distinct schools of Parallel Prose.Among them were broad-based imitation schools,such as the Wei and Jin School,the Six Dynasties School,the Three Tang School,and the Two Song School.Additionally,there were schools with a narrower scope of imitation,including the Early Tang School,the Mid and Late Tang School,and the Northern and Southern Song Schools.Despite the overarching trend of imitating classical styles,the specific literary models chosen by each school varied,creating a complex landscape that necessitates systematic analysis.

关 键 词：清中期 骈文 复古派 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]