乾隆《镇洋县志》所采“椒山序”辨伪  

Scrutiny over “Jiaoshan Preface” Adopted by Qianlong Zhenyang County Records

作　　者：李军[1] Li Jun

机构地区：[1]河北工业大学人文与法律学院、河北省语言文化创新发展研究基地

出　　处：《中国地方志》2025年第1期52-60,M0005,共10页China Local Records

基　　金：2024年度河北雄安新区哲学社会科学课题“杨继盛的文化影响研究”(XASK20240402)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：乾隆《镇洋县志》所采“椒山序”常被学界作为信实材料援引,该序以杨继盛的口吻自述嘉靖二十六年和顾允扬、王世贞肝胆相照。经考,序中“懋称又为元美师”的说法和王世贞对顾氏直称本名的称谓方式不相符合,称名适用于尊长对卑幼,而元美素来尊师重礼。该序对三人当年关系亲密的描述又和王世贞本人记其接交杨继盛的时间存在冲突,王氏关联诗文所记始于嘉靖三十一年冬。因此,“椒山序”属托伪之作,学术研究中应慎重对待这类出自地方志的孤证。The “ Jiaoshan Preface” adopted by Qianlong Zhenyang County Records is often cited as reliable reference by the academic circle. It took the tone of Yang Jisheng and recounted in his own words that in the 26thyear of the Reign of Jiajing he and Gu Yunyang and Wang Shizhen had genuine unity in hearts and minds. Through research, we find that the saying “ Maocheng was also Yuanmei's mentor” in the preface is not consistent with the usual way of addressing that Wang Shizhen directly calling Fu by his given name. Calling somebody by his given name is applicable when the respected elder is addressing a junior of lesser position, while Yunmei was always respectful to his mentors and emphasized etiquette.The description in the preface that the three had close relations at that time was also contradictory to Wang Shizhen's own accounts of the time when he had contacts with Yang Jisheng, which started in the winter of the 31styear of the Reign of Jiajing according to Wang's relevant poems and proses. Therefore,the “Jiaoshan Preface” was a counterfeit work, and isolated claims originated in local records like this one must be treated with caution in academic research.

关 键 词：椒山序 杨继盛 王世贞 顾允扬 辨伪 

分 类 号：K249.3[历史地理—历史学] K29[历史地理—中国史]